- All Products
- Shop by Brands
- BW Technologies
- BW Technologies
- BW Technologies Monitors
- Models
- BW Clip
- BW Clip4
- GasAlertClip Extreme
- GasAlert Extreme
- GasAlertMicroClip XT
- GasAlertMicroClip XL
- GasAlertMicroClip X3
- GasAlertQuattro
- GasAlertMax XT II
- GasAlertMicro 5 Series
- SamplerPak
- IntelliDox Docking System
- MicroDock II
- BW Ultra
- BW Solo
- Gas Monitors
- Gas Monitor Manufacturers
- BW Technologies
- Bacharach
- Biosystems
- Crowcon
- Gas Clip Technologies
- GfG Instruments
- GMI/Detcon
- Honeywell Analytics
- Industrial Scientific
- MSA
- RAE Instruments
- RKI Instruments
- Calibration Gas
- Combustion Analyzers
- Water Quality
- Reliability Instruments
- Refractometers
- HVAC
- Weather
- Temperature
- Laboratory
- Sound
- IAQ
- Electrical
- All Categories
PID Case Study
Case Study
- Fuel barge explosion and cleanup
- On February 21, 2003, a fuel barge loaded with gasoline exploded at a fuel loading dock on Staten Island, New York
- Two workers were killed and another critically burned
- The explosion was the result of an accident, not terrorism or sabotage
- The barge had unloaded about half its cargo of 4 million gallons of unleaded gasoline when the explosion occurred
As the blaze was at its height, officials used tugs to push a nearby barge loaded with 8 million gallons of gasoline to the other side of the waterway, where they covered it with water and foam to ensure that it did not explode.
USCG photo by PA3 Mike Hvozda
- Once the fire was extinguished and the barges cooled, Marine Chemist and Coast Guard personnel conducted structural inspections
- Exposure to toxic VOCs was a primary concern
- Chemicals of concern included the remaining gasoline, benzene, total BTEX (benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes) and total polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (such as naphthalene)
Actual toxicity testing results from gasoline fuel barge #1
Previous Loadings: Cat Feedstock/Crude Oil/Cat Feedstock
SPACE | % LEL | PPM TVOC (iso) | PPM Benzene | %TVOC from benzene |
No (1) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 32.8 | 0.8 | 2.44% |
No (2) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 38.2 | 0.4 | 1.05% |
No (3) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 45.5 | 0.4 | 0.88% |
No (4) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 75.8 | 0.3 | 0.4% |
No (5) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 64.3 | 0.3 | 0.47% |
No (1) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 34.8 | 0.6 | 1.72% |
No (2) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 44.6 | 0.3 | 0.67% |
No (3) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 39.6 | 0.2 | 0.51% |
No (4) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 58.4 | 0.4 | 0.68% |
No (5) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 64.8 | 0.5 | 0.77% |
TVOC alarm setting based on fractional concentration benzene for Barge #1
Worst case (No 1 Port Cargo Tank)
TVOC hazardous condition threshold alarm of 172 ppm isobutylene would prevent exceeding the PEL for benzene of 1.0 PPM
41 x .0244 = 1.0004 ppm
TVOC Hazardous Condition Threshold Alarm for compliance with:
Benzene Exposure Limit | 1.0 PPM | 0.5 PPM | 0.1 PPM |
TVOC alarm setting | 41 PPM | 20.5 PPM | 4.1 PPM |
Actual toxicity testing results from gasoline fuel barge #2
Previous Loadings: Natural Gasoline (3X)
SPACE | % LEL | PPM TVOC (iso) | PPM Benzene | %TVOC from benzene |
No (1) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 37.3 | 0.0 | 0% |
No (2) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 44.1 | 0.1 | 0.23% |
No (3) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 53.8 | 0.2 | 0.37% |
No (4) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 48.2 | 0.1 | 0.21% |
No (5) Port Cargo Tank | 0 | 68.5 | 0.4 | 0.58% |
No (1) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 13.2 | 0.0 | 0% |
No (2) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 29.0 | 0.0 | 0% |
No (3) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 58.1 | 0.1 | 0.17% |
No (4) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 48.7 | 0.2 | 0.41% |
No (5) Stbd Cargo Tank | 0 | 63.3 | 0.3 | 0.44% |
TVOC alarm setting based on fractional concentration benzene for Barge #2
Worst case (No 5 Port Cargo Tank)
TVOC hazardous condition threshold alarm of 172 ppm isobutylene would prevent exceeding the PEL for benzene of 1.0 PPM
172 x .0058 = 0.9976 ppm
TVOC Hazardous Condition Threshold Alarm for compliance with:
Benzene Exposure Limit | 1.0 PPM | 0.5 PPM | 0.1 PPM |
TVOC alarm setting | 172 PPM | 86 PPM | 17.2 PPM |